I find Asch's Conformity experiment interesting, because it made me stop and think of something I never really thought of before. Would I answer the right answer because I thought it was right or would I just go with the rest of the group? The more I thought about it, and related it to personal experiences, I decided I would go with the rest of the group. It would be kind of like a peer pressure thing. For Milgram's Obedience experiment, I think it was absolutely unnecessary to treat humans in such a cruel and unusal way just for a psychological experiment. I can't even imagine putting another human being in so much pain that they could not stand it, intentionally. I mean, can't people eventually die from being shocked at a really high voltage? Lastly, we have the Stanford Prison Experiment. I think this is an absolutely crazy experiment that never should have taken place. This is even worse than Milgram's experiment, in my opinion. Why would someone intentionally put another in so much pain and anguish, knowing the possible outcomes? To me, this is ridiculous and like I mentioned before, I could never do something to harm another person intentionally-especially just for a psychological experiment. However, it was interesting that psychologists did point out that not every person flipped during these experiments; certain people did remain sane and normal and not totally harmed.
A social influence can be seen in one's conformity (adjusting to one's behavior or thinking to coincide with a group standard), compliance, and group behavior. The book gives examples of normative and informational social influences. Normative include influences resulting from a person's desire to gain approval or avoid disapproval. Informational includes influences resulting from one's willingness to accept others' opinions about reality. I think one instance where I am under "normative" influence would be doing my homework in general, but studying for a test in particular. I do not enjoy settling for anything less than like an A on any school assignments and I sometimes feel as if my parents expect that of me (even though they claim they don't..). If I didn't have my parents as role models, I can definitely say I would slack off more in school and probably wouldn't care all that much. Another example that I can think of being involved with social influences could be when I am voted as a "Team Captain" or "President" of any given club. Normally, I would sit back and watch work being done, give my two sense or help out if asked for it, but remain calm and relaxed. However, when I am awarded a leadership role, I feel it is my obligation to get the work done, and to the best of my ability.
The most interesting thing that I learned in this class is about our personalities as human beings. I find it fascinating that every individual is his or her own person and we all vary in personalities so much that you can never really find two people exactly alike. I definitely think it is a good thing though that we all our separate people. How boring would this world be if we were all alike. I always find a person to be a good person if they are their own person and not afraid of it! Overall though, Psychology has really intrigued me, figuring out how and why we do the things we do as human beings.
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Friday, December 11, 2009
Blog Post #12-Psychological Disorders
The book defines a psychological disorder as deviant, distressful, and dysfunctional behavior patterns. Just because someone acts "abornmally" does not mean that he or she necessarily has a psychological disorder. The book states that being different (deviant) from most other people in a culture is part of defining a psychological disorder. Another step in diagnosed a psychological disorder is identifying whether or not this problem causes the individual distress. The last part is if it makes you change your way of life; it makes you dysfunction. The example the book used was that you may have a fear of spiders, and it could make you deviant. However, if it doesn't impact your life, it is truly not a disorder.
Personally, I have never known someone with a psychological disorder. My stepmom, though, watches a certain soap opera (don't remember the name of it!) where a character is schizophrenic. The book describes schizophrenia as a group of severe disorders characterized by disorganized and delusional thinking, disturbed perceptions, and inappropriate emotions and actions. What I have gathered from this character is that she is kind of crazy. One part of her is a very caring, loving wife and mother. However, when the bad side of her creeps out she goes nuts. When she is her good self (oh, and the two people have different names, too) she really wants help and doesn't want to change into her other self, but it's something she really can't help. I would feel really helpless, and overall worthless, if I had this condition. I wouldn't really be able to control what I was doing or why I was doing it.
I think the most interesting thing I read in Chapter 14 was right in the beginning. On the bottom of page 594, it stated that homosexuality was once upon a time classified as an illness. That's crazy! I mean nowadays, it's truly just a way of life and you hear about it all of the time. It goes to show how the times truly do change. I think that it also shows we have opened up our hearts a little bit more to give, as a society, and not be so judgmental, although there still are some opposers out there. When the book then stated that a study showed that homosexuals do have a higher risk of having a psychological disorder, I can see why. They receive criticism for something they really can't help and they may suffer some horrid consequences because of this.
Personally, I have never known someone with a psychological disorder. My stepmom, though, watches a certain soap opera (don't remember the name of it!) where a character is schizophrenic. The book describes schizophrenia as a group of severe disorders characterized by disorganized and delusional thinking, disturbed perceptions, and inappropriate emotions and actions. What I have gathered from this character is that she is kind of crazy. One part of her is a very caring, loving wife and mother. However, when the bad side of her creeps out she goes nuts. When she is her good self (oh, and the two people have different names, too) she really wants help and doesn't want to change into her other self, but it's something she really can't help. I would feel really helpless, and overall worthless, if I had this condition. I wouldn't really be able to control what I was doing or why I was doing it.
I think the most interesting thing I read in Chapter 14 was right in the beginning. On the bottom of page 594, it stated that homosexuality was once upon a time classified as an illness. That's crazy! I mean nowadays, it's truly just a way of life and you hear about it all of the time. It goes to show how the times truly do change. I think that it also shows we have opened up our hearts a little bit more to give, as a society, and not be so judgmental, although there still are some opposers out there. When the book then stated that a study showed that homosexuals do have a higher risk of having a psychological disorder, I can see why. They receive criticism for something they really can't help and they may suffer some horrid consequences because of this.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Blog Post #11-Personality
I think I have a very fun and outgoing personality. While I am very relaxed and laid back, I do take matters seriously and know how to act maturely. I like to think of myself as kind, caring, loving, and compassionate, especially when it comes to my family and closest friends. I am also open minded, always willing to try something new. I want and try to help those in need to the best of my ability. I love learning new things and have learned from my experiences. I love to talk, hence my outgoing personality. I just want to have a good time. Positive traits include: caring, because it makes others feel good; fun, because who doesn't want to have an enjoyable time with me; compassion, because it shows others that they mean something; open mindness, because it lets others know I am willing to take new steps to progress something; and maturity, because people respect me for it. Some not so good traits include: my outgoing personality, because it may at times me too outgoing and gets me into trouble; my ability to comprehend things, because I may come off too strong to people; and talkative, because my mouth sometimes gets the best of me.
I like to think of myself as a very optimist person. I like to look at the brightside of things, and try to avoid the negatives. Sometimes, however, I am pessimistic, but it's usually towards something that doesn't even matter that much, like the Packers losing their football game in the final minutes. Because of my optisim, I think people see me more as a happy and joyful person, which I want. I wouldn't want people to portray me as this grumpy, serious person. I also think that I have a better outlook on life because of my optimism. It keeps me going and allows me to succeed in things such as school or work.
For starters, I know that my maturity level changes from when I'm talking to an elder to say I am hanging out with my friends. I'm still the same person, but the things I do or say become more natural to what a teenager would do when I'm with my friends. If I'm with an elder, I need to act more appropriate and come off as mature. If I acted the same all the time, no matter who I was with, people would perceive me as different. I need to know, and I do realize, that you need to act certain ways around certain people. A second trait that may change between situations would be me being laid back. Although I am content most of the time, there are times when I have to stand up for myself or those around me and let someone know what is on my mind. This would make me come off as more of an..angry person I guess. Overall, I am very laid back and casual though. I only want what is best for me.
Projection-people disguise their own threatening impulses by attributing them to others.Once I told a friend I couldn't do something with her, because my Mom said I had to stay home. However, the truth was I really didn't want to go, because of the person that was going with her. Regression-an individual faced with anxiety retreates to a more infantile psychosexual stage, where some psychic energy remains fixed. An example in my life would be when my dad moved two hours away from me and I had to resort to my mom for everything, she was always there for me, and still is. I am forever grateful to her because of that. Repression-banishes anxiety arousing thoughts, feelings, and memories from consciousness. I think that when once I did something I wasn't supposed to do, I knew my mom could not find out (it wasn't illegal or anything, just something my mom doesn't approve of). So in my mind, it's like I reconstructed the memory altogether to form an alibi that I could tell my mom instead. So far it has worked, and I don't think of the actual memory all that often.
I like to think of myself as a very optimist person. I like to look at the brightside of things, and try to avoid the negatives. Sometimes, however, I am pessimistic, but it's usually towards something that doesn't even matter that much, like the Packers losing their football game in the final minutes. Because of my optisim, I think people see me more as a happy and joyful person, which I want. I wouldn't want people to portray me as this grumpy, serious person. I also think that I have a better outlook on life because of my optimism. It keeps me going and allows me to succeed in things such as school or work.
For starters, I know that my maturity level changes from when I'm talking to an elder to say I am hanging out with my friends. I'm still the same person, but the things I do or say become more natural to what a teenager would do when I'm with my friends. If I'm with an elder, I need to act more appropriate and come off as mature. If I acted the same all the time, no matter who I was with, people would perceive me as different. I need to know, and I do realize, that you need to act certain ways around certain people. A second trait that may change between situations would be me being laid back. Although I am content most of the time, there are times when I have to stand up for myself or those around me and let someone know what is on my mind. This would make me come off as more of an..angry person I guess. Overall, I am very laid back and casual though. I only want what is best for me.
Projection-people disguise their own threatening impulses by attributing them to others.Once I told a friend I couldn't do something with her, because my Mom said I had to stay home. However, the truth was I really didn't want to go, because of the person that was going with her. Regression-an individual faced with anxiety retreates to a more infantile psychosexual stage, where some psychic energy remains fixed. An example in my life would be when my dad moved two hours away from me and I had to resort to my mom for everything, she was always there for me, and still is. I am forever grateful to her because of that. Repression-banishes anxiety arousing thoughts, feelings, and memories from consciousness. I think that when once I did something I wasn't supposed to do, I knew my mom could not find out (it wasn't illegal or anything, just something my mom doesn't approve of). So in my mind, it's like I reconstructed the memory altogether to form an alibi that I could tell my mom instead. So far it has worked, and I don't think of the actual memory all that often.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Blog Post #10-Thinking & Intelligence
In Chapter 9, I learned about intuition. The book defines intuition as an effortless, immediate, automatatic feeling or thought, as contrasted with explicit, conscious reasoning. One's intuition can stop them from solving problems correctly, making wise decisions, forming valid judgments, or reasoning logically. The book explains "Intuition's Dozen Deadly Sins." The "sins" that I found most intriguing, and that I can mostly relate to are hindsight bias and overconfidence. Hindsight bias is when someone looks back on events and falsely surmises that they knew it all along. For example, let's say I get one wrong on a test. I get my test back and I think to myself, "Oh, I knew that was the answer! Why did I mark the wrong one?" This would be my intuition getting the best of me, hence the hindsight bias coming into effect. Overconfidence is one's intutitive assessments of his or her own knowledge are often more confident than correct. I remember it was stated in the book in a previous chapter that, "humans tend to be more overconfident than not." I believe this is completely true and that we as human beings do not like to think of the actuality of real life and can talk ourselves into anything.
Emotional intelligence is the ability to perceive, understand, manage, and use emotions. To perceive emotions is to recognize them in faces, music and stories. To understand emotions is to predict them and how they change and blend. To manage emotions is to know how to express them in varied situations. To use emotions is to enable adaptive or creative thinking. It is said that if one is emotionally intelligent, they are self-aware and enjoy higher quality interactions with friends. They can read others' emotions well and know what to say to a friend who is grieving, needs encouragement, or just solve a problem. I would consider myself to be emotionally intelligent. I think this is important, because I am able to build better bonds with the people around me, especially my family and close friends. I feel like I can relate to people and can help them in whatever ways that they need it. I can perceive emotions, tell it by someone's facial expressions. Some people may puzzle me, but for the most part I'm pretty good. I understand emotions, because I can tell if someone is angry, for instance, and know how I can change them to feel happy. I can manage my emotions. I know when and when it is not appropriate to express certain emotions. For example, it's ok to cry during a sad movie, but not ok to be laughing. I can use emotions in activities, such as, a school musical or during a school project.
In Chapter 10, I learned why genders differ in mental ability scores. I learned that girls spell better (I think it's because we actually care about people perceive us and what we can do), are more verbally fluent, better at locating objects (AKA not losing everything), better at detecting emotions, and more sensitive to touch, taste and color. Boys are better at mathematics and outnumber us women at the low and high extremes of mental abilities. Boys are also more likely to be found in special education classes, because they talk later than sooner.
Emotional intelligence is the ability to perceive, understand, manage, and use emotions. To perceive emotions is to recognize them in faces, music and stories. To understand emotions is to predict them and how they change and blend. To manage emotions is to know how to express them in varied situations. To use emotions is to enable adaptive or creative thinking. It is said that if one is emotionally intelligent, they are self-aware and enjoy higher quality interactions with friends. They can read others' emotions well and know what to say to a friend who is grieving, needs encouragement, or just solve a problem. I would consider myself to be emotionally intelligent. I think this is important, because I am able to build better bonds with the people around me, especially my family and close friends. I feel like I can relate to people and can help them in whatever ways that they need it. I can perceive emotions, tell it by someone's facial expressions. Some people may puzzle me, but for the most part I'm pretty good. I understand emotions, because I can tell if someone is angry, for instance, and know how I can change them to feel happy. I can manage my emotions. I know when and when it is not appropriate to express certain emotions. For example, it's ok to cry during a sad movie, but not ok to be laughing. I can use emotions in activities, such as, a school musical or during a school project.
In Chapter 10, I learned why genders differ in mental ability scores. I learned that girls spell better (I think it's because we actually care about people perceive us and what we can do), are more verbally fluent, better at locating objects (AKA not losing everything), better at detecting emotions, and more sensitive to touch, taste and color. Boys are better at mathematics and outnumber us women at the low and high extremes of mental abilities. Boys are also more likely to be found in special education classes, because they talk later than sooner.
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Blog Post #9-Memory
Memory is definitely important in defining who we are as human beings. Everything we have done in our past is a memory and because we remember such things, we learn and grow through our experiences. If we didn't have a memory, we obviously wouldn't know how to do the average everyday things that we do. I don't know how people would go on with their lives, if everyone really didn't know what they were doing.
Clive Wearing is a very talented musician, whether it come to conducting, composing, singing, or playing an instrument, he can do it all. One day he had a headache which turned into an ongoing fever and then he began to forget things, even his own daughter's name. The doctors then realized that his left, right, and frontal lobes were messed up, hence his forgetfulness. Wearing often repeats himself. His life involves only one moment, whatever is happening around him. It hits his brain and then it will fade away. He has no past memories and no future to look forward to. He will look at his watch to record the time and what he is doing, but then when he looks back at it, he talks himself into that he was unconscious when he wrote it, and then he'll just rewrite what he wants it to say. Music comes to him automatically though, it's the one thing that is a safe for him, but once the music stops, he starts to have convulsions. My sympathy goes out to Clive's wife like no other. I give her MAJOR props for sticking it out, knowing that her husband has no idea what is truly going on in his world. If I were in her shoes, I would probably go crazy. I like to think of my memory as being pretty good, so this case makes me appreciate it that much more, getting to remember even then little details from memories.
I am thinking differently of our memories now, because I always used to think that it was there to help us remember things and there was nothing more to it than that. In the book, memory is defined as the persistence of learning over time through the storage and retrieval of information. I didn't really understand that pretty much everything that we can sense in our environment can be put into our mind's memory. That is my breakdown of what automatic processing is. I still think of my memories the same, I just can understand why they can be so detailed now, I have always thought of myself as having a good memory (unless it comes to something I just choose not to remember). I did the "Recognition" exercise. You were given 16 different pictures of pennies and you had to choose what the actual penny looks like, it took me about 7 tries to get it right. This goes to show that everyday things, a penny in this case, you see all the time don't register in your brain and you don't remember exactly what it looks like. Another example could be the design on a pop can, such as Coca-Cola.
I found it intriguing to read about Jill Price, a woman who just can't forget. I feel really bad for her actually, you would have to find that annoying after awhile. In the book, it was mentioned that, "If we remembered everything, we should on most occasions be as ill off as if we remembered nothing." I completely agree with this. Yes, you obviously would be sick if you had no memory, that is definitely a more common case in today's world (such as amnesia). People don't really stop and think though if it was just the other way around, what would happen if we remembered EVERYTHING about our lives?
Clive Wearing is a very talented musician, whether it come to conducting, composing, singing, or playing an instrument, he can do it all. One day he had a headache which turned into an ongoing fever and then he began to forget things, even his own daughter's name. The doctors then realized that his left, right, and frontal lobes were messed up, hence his forgetfulness. Wearing often repeats himself. His life involves only one moment, whatever is happening around him. It hits his brain and then it will fade away. He has no past memories and no future to look forward to. He will look at his watch to record the time and what he is doing, but then when he looks back at it, he talks himself into that he was unconscious when he wrote it, and then he'll just rewrite what he wants it to say. Music comes to him automatically though, it's the one thing that is a safe for him, but once the music stops, he starts to have convulsions. My sympathy goes out to Clive's wife like no other. I give her MAJOR props for sticking it out, knowing that her husband has no idea what is truly going on in his world. If I were in her shoes, I would probably go crazy. I like to think of my memory as being pretty good, so this case makes me appreciate it that much more, getting to remember even then little details from memories.
I am thinking differently of our memories now, because I always used to think that it was there to help us remember things and there was nothing more to it than that. In the book, memory is defined as the persistence of learning over time through the storage and retrieval of information. I didn't really understand that pretty much everything that we can sense in our environment can be put into our mind's memory. That is my breakdown of what automatic processing is. I still think of my memories the same, I just can understand why they can be so detailed now, I have always thought of myself as having a good memory (unless it comes to something I just choose not to remember). I did the "Recognition" exercise. You were given 16 different pictures of pennies and you had to choose what the actual penny looks like, it took me about 7 tries to get it right. This goes to show that everyday things, a penny in this case, you see all the time don't register in your brain and you don't remember exactly what it looks like. Another example could be the design on a pop can, such as Coca-Cola.
I found it intriguing to read about Jill Price, a woman who just can't forget. I feel really bad for her actually, you would have to find that annoying after awhile. In the book, it was mentioned that, "If we remembered everything, we should on most occasions be as ill off as if we remembered nothing." I completely agree with this. Yes, you obviously would be sick if you had no memory, that is definitely a more common case in today's world (such as amnesia). People don't really stop and think though if it was just the other way around, what would happen if we remembered EVERYTHING about our lives?
Monday, November 2, 2009
Blog Post #8
Classical conditioning is a type of learning in which one learns to link two or more stimuli and anticipate events. An example I found in the book would be a female rape victim. She feared particular people and places, but in general, it was all people and places. Operant conditioning is a type of learning in which behavior is strengthened if followed by a reinforcer or diminished if followed by a punisher. An example of this could be a little kid told he or she will get a candy bar if they go to the bathroom while being potty trained. Furthermore, this example would be considered positive reinforcement. The difference between the two is that in classical conditioning, an individual learns associations between events it does not control while in operant conditioning, an individual learns associations between its behavior and resulting events. I think this is cool, because it goes to show that there are differences between things in your life that you can control and what you can't.
Positive reinforcement is increasing behaviors by presenting positive stimuli. A positive reinforcer is any stimulus that, when presented after a response, strengthens the response. An example would be winning a gold medal for placing in a competition. An individual would probably push themselves harder and harder knowing that they could be rewarded for being good. After all of their hard work was done, and if they did place, they would get the medal and all of their work would have paid off. Negative reinforcement is increasing behaviors by stopping or reducing negative stimuli. A negative reinforcer is any stimulus that, when removed after a response, strengthens the response. An example would be your mom telling you to clean up your room all of the time and then you finally do it. An individual would procrastinate so they wouldn't have to do this work, but know that they would eventually do it. After they finally got fed up of being narked at, they would finally give in and clean up the room. Afterwards, they would probably feel a sense of relief of finally completing the task. Punishment is an event that decreases the behavior that it follows. An example would be getting a spanking when you didn't listen to a parent. You obviously did something that you knew you weren't supposed to, but did anyways. As a result, you get punished, and you feel bad for your actions (most of the time anyways.)
I think the most interesting thing I read in Chapter 7 was about prosocial and antisocial effects. I never actually stopped and thought of why people do the good (or bad) things that they do. Prosocial behavior is defined as positive, constructive, helpful behavior. Antisocial is obviously the exact opposite. An example the book tells of prosocial behavior is if you want children to be encouraged to read, read to them or make books available to them in their environment. Furthermore, there are negative effects people have on each other, called antisocial effects. An example the books shares is if a child has abusive parents, they may tend to be more aggressive than other children. I can relate this to my life because of my two little siblings. I have a sister who is 5 and a brother who is 2. They mean the world to me and I only want what is best for them. By me doing the things that I want them to do too, I realize through the concept of "prosocial effects" that I may be able to accomplish this.
Positive reinforcement is increasing behaviors by presenting positive stimuli. A positive reinforcer is any stimulus that, when presented after a response, strengthens the response. An example would be winning a gold medal for placing in a competition. An individual would probably push themselves harder and harder knowing that they could be rewarded for being good. After all of their hard work was done, and if they did place, they would get the medal and all of their work would have paid off. Negative reinforcement is increasing behaviors by stopping or reducing negative stimuli. A negative reinforcer is any stimulus that, when removed after a response, strengthens the response. An example would be your mom telling you to clean up your room all of the time and then you finally do it. An individual would procrastinate so they wouldn't have to do this work, but know that they would eventually do it. After they finally got fed up of being narked at, they would finally give in and clean up the room. Afterwards, they would probably feel a sense of relief of finally completing the task. Punishment is an event that decreases the behavior that it follows. An example would be getting a spanking when you didn't listen to a parent. You obviously did something that you knew you weren't supposed to, but did anyways. As a result, you get punished, and you feel bad for your actions (most of the time anyways.)
I think the most interesting thing I read in Chapter 7 was about prosocial and antisocial effects. I never actually stopped and thought of why people do the good (or bad) things that they do. Prosocial behavior is defined as positive, constructive, helpful behavior. Antisocial is obviously the exact opposite. An example the book tells of prosocial behavior is if you want children to be encouraged to read, read to them or make books available to them in their environment. Furthermore, there are negative effects people have on each other, called antisocial effects. An example the books shares is if a child has abusive parents, they may tend to be more aggressive than other children. I can relate this to my life because of my two little siblings. I have a sister who is 5 and a brother who is 2. They mean the world to me and I only want what is best for them. By me doing the things that I want them to do too, I realize through the concept of "prosocial effects" that I may be able to accomplish this.
Monday, October 26, 2009
Blog Post #7
Sensation is what we sense in our environment. We use all of our senses (hear, feel, touch, smell, see) in this process. Our nervous system plays a big part in sensation, having our sensory receptors telling us to respond to whatever we sense. Perception is taking what we sense in our environment, and breaking it down into what it really means. For example, we could sense that something is brushing up against our body, but it would take perception to figure out just what the thing is.
Even though I've learned about this in previous science classes, I think it's always intriguing to learn more about color vision. The example given in the book shows us how a tomato really is everything but red, because it rejects the long wavelengths of the color red. The book also mentions that we can discrimante about 7 million different colors variations-that is absolutely crazy. But about everyone 1 in 50 people is color blind. It's usually a male that is affected, because this defect is sex linked. I also learned that according to the Young-Helmholtz trichromatic theory, our the retinas in our eyes contain three different color receptors, and when they are stimulated in any combination, we can percieve pretty much any color. Learning about this helps me to realize why we visually see things the way we do.
I typed in "sensation" and read the article "Seven Ways Music Influences Mood." Having a strong sensation is one of the top reasons. It says that music can provide deep, thrilling, emotional experiences, especially if you are performing. Also on the list was entertainment, revival, diversion, discharge, mental work, and solace. Altogether these seven objectives have a main goal-to control and improve a mood. I can totally relate to this article. I have a very big passion for music and I resort to it in pretty much any situation. Music is a way for me to relax and just think about something else for the time being.
Even though I've learned about this in previous science classes, I think it's always intriguing to learn more about color vision. The example given in the book shows us how a tomato really is everything but red, because it rejects the long wavelengths of the color red. The book also mentions that we can discrimante about 7 million different colors variations-that is absolutely crazy. But about everyone 1 in 50 people is color blind. It's usually a male that is affected, because this defect is sex linked. I also learned that according to the Young-Helmholtz trichromatic theory, our the retinas in our eyes contain three different color receptors, and when they are stimulated in any combination, we can percieve pretty much any color. Learning about this helps me to realize why we visually see things the way we do.
I typed in "sensation" and read the article "Seven Ways Music Influences Mood." Having a strong sensation is one of the top reasons. It says that music can provide deep, thrilling, emotional experiences, especially if you are performing. Also on the list was entertainment, revival, diversion, discharge, mental work, and solace. Altogether these seven objectives have a main goal-to control and improve a mood. I can totally relate to this article. I have a very big passion for music and I resort to it in pretty much any situation. Music is a way for me to relax and just think about something else for the time being.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Blog Post #6
While interviewing my Grandma for our "Historical Perspective on Adolescence" assignment, I was very surprised by the fact that she said she never had homework in high school. I can't even imagine my life without homework, since it pretty much takes over my life. I think life is easier now with all of the technological advances we have, but at the same time, we have so much more stuff to learn about these days, that the actual schooling is harder, in my opinion. I like being a teenager this day in age so I don't think I would go back. Adolescence will always be a hard time in your life no matter which era you live in.
I'd say I've lived up my "adolescent" period. There has always been drama, but when the going gets tough-you just have to be tougher. I think the video was good at pointing out that parents should be close with their kids, but not too close, they need to keep a distance. I agree with this concept, and this is how my own parents are, for the most part. I tell them what's going on in my life, and in return for my honesty, they trust me to go out and make responsible decisions. Because of this, I believe going into adulthood will be an easy transition for me. I have always been dependable and liable and I don't see that changing in the future.
I found it interesting in Chapter 4 of all different kinds of norms from all over the world. We even discussed some of these in class and I was just so confused as to why some countries would allow people to do such things! For instance, the example in the book shows that in Scotland you can leave your baby in its stroller outside a store if you go shopping. To me, that is absolutely outrageous!! I could never ever do this to a kid close to me, let alone my own! As for Chapter 5, I learned the basic levels of moral thinking. I did my Go! Animate video on this topic. Preconventional morality occurs in children, often before age nine. They only obey rules if they know they'd get punished otherwise, or if they'll be rewarded. Conventional morality is the next level, in early adolescence one focuses on caring for others and laws and rules, simply because it is a law or rule. The final level is postconventional morality, where people's decisions and actions are based on what they think is ethically right.
I'd say I've lived up my "adolescent" period. There has always been drama, but when the going gets tough-you just have to be tougher. I think the video was good at pointing out that parents should be close with their kids, but not too close, they need to keep a distance. I agree with this concept, and this is how my own parents are, for the most part. I tell them what's going on in my life, and in return for my honesty, they trust me to go out and make responsible decisions. Because of this, I believe going into adulthood will be an easy transition for me. I have always been dependable and liable and I don't see that changing in the future.
I found it interesting in Chapter 4 of all different kinds of norms from all over the world. We even discussed some of these in class and I was just so confused as to why some countries would allow people to do such things! For instance, the example in the book shows that in Scotland you can leave your baby in its stroller outside a store if you go shopping. To me, that is absolutely outrageous!! I could never ever do this to a kid close to me, let alone my own! As for Chapter 5, I learned the basic levels of moral thinking. I did my Go! Animate video on this topic. Preconventional morality occurs in children, often before age nine. They only obey rules if they know they'd get punished otherwise, or if they'll be rewarded. Conventional morality is the next level, in early adolescence one focuses on caring for others and laws and rules, simply because it is a law or rule. The final level is postconventional morality, where people's decisions and actions are based on what they think is ethically right.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Blog Post #5
I learned from Chapter 4 things I learned in my Biology class, such as DNA, chromosomes, and genes. I learned the difference between fraternal and identical twins. Fraternal twins are from different fertilized eggs, while identical twins develop from a single fertilized egg. Shared genes can lead into shared experiences. For example, if one twin has Alzheimers', the probability of the other twin developing the illness is extremely likely. I learned that each cultural group has a norm, or rules for accepted and expected behavior. A norm mentioned that I thought was odd, was that the British have a norm for waiting in line. I also learned that human males and females ten to be more alike than different, and I never really realized that. We have the same senses and a very similar genetic makeup. As always, I was intrigued to learn all of these new things, it's very interesting to see just how unique we humans are.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Blog Post #4
I read the article "What? Me Biased?" The article pretty much summed up how we as humans think unconsciously and are more often than not biased. An example they used was comparing the British actress Kate Winslet to the Asian-American actress Lucy Liu. Researchers showed that many people think of Winslet, who is not American, more of an American than Liu just by looking at their faces. They also went on to make reference as to how crucial the 2008 Presidential election was in American history, voting in our first African American President. I found it interesting to relize just how biased we are on a day to day basis, and it's more often than we think.
I found it crazy how much information our senses take in-in just one second! I also read up on the different sleep stages, and our our body almost like loses consciousness. I wish I could get more sleep on a regular basis, and I found out just how much it affects me when I don't get the sleep I need. I think this is what surprised me the most, too. I never realized the different things that you should do in order to get enough sleep, and what all affects you when you don't get enough sleep. I think that perhaps I can make my lifestyle better if I start to get a better sleep pattern.
I agree to why we dream what we dream (to satisfy our own wishes, to file away memories, to develop and preserve neural pathways, to make sense of neural static, or to reflect cognitive development) considering these are the categories all of my dreams would fall into. Overall, I rather enjoyed this section, because I could more directly relate to what they were talking about.
I found it crazy how much information our senses take in-in just one second! I also read up on the different sleep stages, and our our body almost like loses consciousness. I wish I could get more sleep on a regular basis, and I found out just how much it affects me when I don't get the sleep I need. I think this is what surprised me the most, too. I never realized the different things that you should do in order to get enough sleep, and what all affects you when you don't get enough sleep. I think that perhaps I can make my lifestyle better if I start to get a better sleep pattern.
I agree to why we dream what we dream (to satisfy our own wishes, to file away memories, to develop and preserve neural pathways, to make sense of neural static, or to reflect cognitive development) considering these are the categories all of my dreams would fall into. Overall, I rather enjoyed this section, because I could more directly relate to what they were talking about.
Monday, September 28, 2009
Blog Post #3
The first activity I did was "Chance in Life and The World." A fuzzy screen consisting of yellow and magenta colored dots flashing at you showed up. The visibility started at 50% so both sides were equal, you then had to switch it up towards 100% or down towards 0%. The word "Serendip" would eventually become clear. If you went one way, you would see less yellow and more magenta, while the other way would consist of less magenta and more yellow. The second activity I did was "Seeing More Than Your Eye Does." This was rather intriguing. There was a small picture of a cross on the left side and a dot on the right side. You were to close your left eye while staring at the cross with your right eye. You then gradually moved closer to the computer screen where the dot would suddenly disappear and then reappear. They said it goes to show you have a "blind spot." I learned from these activities that not everything is as it seems and there's more to things that what you can sense, which is your vision in these instances. In my everyday life now, I can use this as to thinking deeper at everything around me, and not just seeing everything as is. If I do this more often in my everyday surroundings, my perception of the world could definitely change, as I probably wouldn't be thinking the same as everyone around me, but in fact, a little deeper.
I learned that neurons help the body to process information, and this is why our bodies function and do the things they do. A sensory neuron, for instance, carries messages to your brain and spinal cord. Another thing I learned about the tools you can use to examine our brains. An EEG or PET scan is an example. With these technological advances, we can research about our brains, as to why we think the way we do. I used to think of the brain as a sometimes big, mushy, gross thing somewhere up there in our heads, but now I can tell how it actually works. I also found it pretty cool how the brain works with "plasticity," how it can help itself after damage has been done.
I found the video "The Man With Two Brains" rather intriguing. It was kind of confusing, but I think I understand it. It's really weird to think that a person can, but at the same time can't, comprehend everyday, simple things with a split brain, having two halves. At the same time, it is a big advance for the researchers involved with the experiment, it's like Christmas everyday, finding out something new and exciting!
I learned that neurons help the body to process information, and this is why our bodies function and do the things they do. A sensory neuron, for instance, carries messages to your brain and spinal cord. Another thing I learned about the tools you can use to examine our brains. An EEG or PET scan is an example. With these technological advances, we can research about our brains, as to why we think the way we do. I used to think of the brain as a sometimes big, mushy, gross thing somewhere up there in our heads, but now I can tell how it actually works. I also found it pretty cool how the brain works with "plasticity," how it can help itself after damage has been done.
I found the video "The Man With Two Brains" rather intriguing. It was kind of confusing, but I think I understand it. It's really weird to think that a person can, but at the same time can't, comprehend everyday, simple things with a split brain, having two halves. At the same time, it is a big advance for the researchers involved with the experiment, it's like Christmas everyday, finding out something new and exciting!
Monday, September 21, 2009
Blog Post #2
I believe the importance of reserach is so we can know exactly why or how something happens, and we don't necessarily need to assume it. This way we will have scientific proof and therefore increase our knowledge of the topic. While doing research, we could maybe even accidentally find something else out, which would make the research process even more successful.
I read the article "Why You Can't Help Believing Everything You Read." It was actually really interesting and it pretty much showed how biased we humans truly are. They had set up an experiment where two different groups were given statements about an armed robbery that had occured. Both groups were told that sentences in green were true while sentences in red were false. One group was interrupted while reading, which made them in the end give the robber, on average, double the jail sentence as the other group. The experiment goes on to show that if people are given time to thoroughly think about what they are reading, then they can register if something is really false.
I learned from Chapter 1 that there are many ways to pursue research, and in the end we find out the cause and effect of everyday problems. I also learned that everything in life is at random, even if you try to find or make a pattern. I found it interesting that researchers in some cases find it alright to experiment on humans to gain knowledge. I say it's okay to practice on animals, as long as they are not suffering, but a human being? I believe that is crossing the line.
I read the article "Why You Can't Help Believing Everything You Read." It was actually really interesting and it pretty much showed how biased we humans truly are. They had set up an experiment where two different groups were given statements about an armed robbery that had occured. Both groups were told that sentences in green were true while sentences in red were false. One group was interrupted while reading, which made them in the end give the robber, on average, double the jail sentence as the other group. The experiment goes on to show that if people are given time to thoroughly think about what they are reading, then they can register if something is really false.
I learned from Chapter 1 that there are many ways to pursue research, and in the end we find out the cause and effect of everyday problems. I also learned that everything in life is at random, even if you try to find or make a pattern. I found it interesting that researchers in some cases find it alright to experiment on humans to gain knowledge. I say it's okay to practice on animals, as long as they are not suffering, but a human being? I believe that is crossing the line.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Chapter 1
Before starting this class, I thought that Psychology was just the study of the mind. However, I never really thought about what it entailed. Now that I've read through Chapter 1, it got me thinking. How do our minds work in specific ways? How do we get to be the people we are? Why do we function the way we do? What would happen if we were all alike? It made me think more in depth as to why psychology is so important, and what life would be without the concept.
I have now realized that Psychology affects my life more than I would have ever thought. For example, hindsight. I can't tell you how many times I've looked back on something saying, "oh I shouldn't have bought that!" or, "oops, I totally forgot all about it!" A time traveling machine would be nice at times like these, but you have to face reality and even if you tell everyone "you knew it all along" that you actually goofed up. Another example the book gave was that humans tend to be overconfident, which is also true, but something yet again we hate to admit. As for the three components of scientific attitude, they take place in my everyday life-curiosity, skeptcism, and humility.
One thing that I learned is the three research methods explained to us in Chapter 1 (descriptive, correlational, and experimental). When I think research, I automatically think, just go on the Internet and Google it. However, I learned ways that you can actually conduct reserach. Descriptive observes and records behavior, correlational detects naturally ocurring relationships, and experimental is set up to explore cause and effect.
Another thing I have learned this chapter is the way we humans perceive order in random events. We are always trying to find a pattern in random data, even though it will always remain random! Flipping a coin for example. You would normally think if you would flip it six times, that 50% would end up heads, and the other 50% would be tails. However, it's the same likelihood that it could be 4 heads and 2 tails, or vice versa, and so on.
I have now realized that Psychology affects my life more than I would have ever thought. For example, hindsight. I can't tell you how many times I've looked back on something saying, "oh I shouldn't have bought that!" or, "oops, I totally forgot all about it!" A time traveling machine would be nice at times like these, but you have to face reality and even if you tell everyone "you knew it all along" that you actually goofed up. Another example the book gave was that humans tend to be overconfident, which is also true, but something yet again we hate to admit. As for the three components of scientific attitude, they take place in my everyday life-curiosity, skeptcism, and humility.
One thing that I learned is the three research methods explained to us in Chapter 1 (descriptive, correlational, and experimental). When I think research, I automatically think, just go on the Internet and Google it. However, I learned ways that you can actually conduct reserach. Descriptive observes and records behavior, correlational detects naturally ocurring relationships, and experimental is set up to explore cause and effect.
Another thing I have learned this chapter is the way we humans perceive order in random events. We are always trying to find a pattern in random data, even though it will always remain random! Flipping a coin for example. You would normally think if you would flip it six times, that 50% would end up heads, and the other 50% would be tails. However, it's the same likelihood that it could be 4 heads and 2 tails, or vice versa, and so on.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Introductory Post
Hi, my name is Rian Lamb. I am a 17 year old senior at Stratford High School. I think my family has shaped how I am today. I have a great family who has supported me through everything and they have helped me become who I am today. I think studying Psychology is important, because it will help me to understand more about how and why humans do the things we do. I think that Psychology is the study of your mind and behaviors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)